Does the technology detract from the core message?

A good question! Where do we draw the line between relevant methodology and too much focus on the means of communication? The balancing act between presenting truth and becoming enamored with the “gee-whiz” factor is a struggle most electronic churches face. When do we know that we have crossed over the line from effective media to a neat show? Each of us has to determine the line. Unfortunately, those of us most excited about the use of technology in our churches are often the worst abusers of that technology.  If we are completely honest with ourselves, we will admit that we easily fall into the trap of “more is better,” or “flash equals substance.” The plugged in  preacher has to be aware of the tendency to over-use technology to the point of distraction. The other end of the spectrum is utilizing boring, humdrum visuals which fail to take a balanced advantage of the medium.

Where do we find the balance? The place to start is to ask others to evaluate our presentations for the following:

1.    Do the visuals enhance understanding of the message?

2.    Are the visuals easy to read?

3.    Do the visuals distract from the message?

4.    Are there better ways to present the information than those used in these visuals?

5.    Could the person with the worst eye-sight in my congregation read the visuals from the worst seat in the church?

Be willing to swallow your pride, and accept the input of others.